Making new layers and models via subclassing
- Original Link : https://keras.io/guides/making_new_layers_and_models_via_subclassing/
- Last Checked at : 2024-11-18
Author: fchollet
Date created: 2019/03/01
Last modified: 2023/06/25
Description: Complete guide to writing Layer
and Model
objects from scratch.
Introduction
This guide will cover everything you need to know to build your own subclassed layers and models. In particular, you’ll learn about the following features:
- The
Layer
class - The
add_weight()
method - Trainable and non-trainable weights
- The
build()
method - Making sure your layers can be used with any backend
- The
add_loss()
method - The
training
argument incall()
- The
mask
argument incall()
- Making sure your layers can be serialized
Let’s dive in.
Setup
import numpy as np
import keras
from keras import ops
from keras import layers
The Layer
class: the combination of state (weights) and some computation
One of the central abstractions in Keras is the Layer
class. A layer encapsulates both a state (the layer’s “weights”) and a transformation from inputs to outputs (a “call”, the layer’s forward pass).
Here’s a densely-connected layer. It has two state variables: the variables w
and b
.
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, units=32, input_dim=32):
super().__init__()
self.w = self.add_weight(
shape=(input_dim, units),
initializer="random_normal",
trainable=True,
)
self.b = self.add_weight(shape=(units,), initializer="zeros", trainable=True)
def call(self, inputs):
return ops.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
You would use a layer by calling it on some tensor input(s), much like a Python function.
x = ops.ones((2, 2))
linear_layer = Linear(4, 2)
y = linear_layer(x)
print(y)
Result
[[ 0.085416 -0.06821361 -0.00741937 -0.03429271]
[ 0.085416 -0.06821361 -0.00741937 -0.03429271]]
Note that the weights w
and b
are automatically tracked by the layer upon being set as layer attributes:
assert linear_layer.weights == [linear_layer.w, linear_layer.b]
Layers can have non-trainable weights
Besides trainable weights, you can add non-trainable weights to a layer as well. Such weights are meant not to be taken into account during backpropagation, when you are training the layer.
Here’s how to add and use a non-trainable weight:
class ComputeSum(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, input_dim):
super().__init__()
self.total = self.add_weight(
initializer="zeros", shape=(input_dim,), trainable=False
)
def call(self, inputs):
self.total.assign_add(ops.sum(inputs, axis=0))
return self.total
x = ops.ones((2, 2))
my_sum = ComputeSum(2)
y = my_sum(x)
print(y.numpy())
y = my_sum(x)
print(y.numpy())
Result
[2. 2.]
[4. 4.]
It’s part of layer.weights
, but it gets categorized as a non-trainable weight:
print("weights:", len(my_sum.weights))
print("non-trainable weights:", len(my_sum.non_trainable_weights))
# It's not included in the trainable weights:
print("trainable_weights:", my_sum.trainable_weights)
Result
weights: 1
non-trainable weights: 1
trainable_weights: []
Best practice: deferring weight creation until the shape of the inputs is known
Our Linear
layer above took an input_dim
argument that was used to compute the shape of the weights w
and b
in __init__()
:
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, units=32, input_dim=32):
super().__init__()
self.w = self.add_weight(
shape=(input_dim, units),
initializer="random_normal",
trainable=True,
)
self.b = self.add_weight(shape=(units,), initializer="zeros", trainable=True)
def call(self, inputs):
return ops.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
In many cases, you may not know in advance the size of your inputs, and you would like to lazily create weights when that value becomes known, some time after instantiating the layer.
In the Keras API, we recommend creating layer weights in the build(self, inputs_shape)
method of your layer. Like this:
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, units=32):
super().__init__()
self.units = units
def build(self, input_shape):
self.w = self.add_weight(
shape=(input_shape[-1], self.units),
initializer="random_normal",
trainable=True,
)
self.b = self.add_weight(
shape=(self.units,), initializer="random_normal", trainable=True
)
def call(self, inputs):
return ops.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
The __call__()
method of your layer will automatically run build the first time it is called. You now have a layer that’s lazy and thus easier to use:
# At instantiation, we don't know on what inputs this is going to get called
linear_layer = Linear(32)
# The layer's weights are created dynamically the first time the layer is called
y = linear_layer(x)
Implementing build()
separately as shown above nicely separates creating weights only once from using weights in every call.
Layers are recursively composable
If you assign a Layer instance as an attribute of another Layer, the outer layer will start tracking the weights created by the inner layer.
We recommend creating such sublayers in the __init__()
method and leave it to the first __call__()
to trigger building their weights.
class MLPBlock(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.linear_1 = Linear(32)
self.linear_2 = Linear(32)
self.linear_3 = Linear(1)
def call(self, inputs):
x = self.linear_1(inputs)
x = keras.activations.relu(x)
x = self.linear_2(x)
x = keras.activations.relu(x)
return self.linear_3(x)
mlp = MLPBlock()
y = mlp(ops.ones(shape=(3, 64))) # The first call to the `mlp` will create the weights
print("weights:", len(mlp.weights))
print("trainable weights:", len(mlp.trainable_weights))
Result
weights: 6
trainable weights: 6
Backend-agnostic layers and backend-specific layers
As long as a layer only uses APIs from the keras.ops
namespace (or other Keras namespaces such as keras.activations
, keras.random
, or keras.layers
), then it can be used with any backend – TensorFlow, JAX, or PyTorch.
All layers you’ve seen so far in this guide work with all Keras backends.
The keras.ops
namespace gives you access to:
- The NumPy API, e.g.
ops.matmul
,ops.sum
,ops.reshape
,ops.stack
, etc. - Neural networks-specific APIs such as
ops.softmax
,ops.conv
,ops.binary_crossentropy
,ops.relu
, etc.
You can also use backend-native APIs in your layers (such as tf.nn
functions), but if you do this, then your layer will only be usable with the backend in question. For instance, you could write the following JAX-specific layer using jax.numpy
:
import jax
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
...
def call(self, inputs):
return jax.numpy.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
This would be the equivalent TensorFlow-specific layer:
import tensorflow as tf
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
...
def call(self, inputs):
return tf.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
And this would be the equivalent PyTorch-specific layer:
import torch
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
...
def call(self, inputs):
return torch.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
Because cross-backend compatibility is a tremendously useful property, we strongly recommend that you seek to always make your layers backend-agnostic by leveraging only Keras APIs.
The add_loss()
method
When writing the call()
method of a layer, you can create loss tensors that you will want to use later, when writing your training loop. This is doable by calling self.add_loss(value)
:
# A layer that creates an activity regularization loss
class ActivityRegularizationLayer(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, rate=1e-2):
super().__init__()
self.rate = rate
def call(self, inputs):
self.add_loss(self.rate * ops.mean(inputs))
return inputs
These losses (including those created by any inner layer) can be retrieved via layer.losses
. This property is reset at the start of every __call__()
to the top-level layer, so that layer.losses
always contains the loss values created during the last forward pass.
class OuterLayer(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.activity_reg = ActivityRegularizationLayer(1e-2)
def call(self, inputs):
return self.activity_reg(inputs)
layer = OuterLayer()
assert len(layer.losses) == 0 # No losses yet since the layer has never been called
_ = layer(ops.zeros((1, 1)))
assert len(layer.losses) == 1 # We created one loss value
# `layer.losses` gets reset at the start of each __call__
_ = layer(ops.zeros((1, 1)))
assert len(layer.losses) == 1 # This is the loss created during the call above
In addition, the loss
property also contains regularization losses created for the weights of any inner layer:
class OuterLayerWithKernelRegularizer(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.dense = keras.layers.Dense(
32, kernel_regularizer=keras.regularizers.l2(1e-3)
)
def call(self, inputs):
return self.dense(inputs)
layer = OuterLayerWithKernelRegularizer()
_ = layer(ops.zeros((1, 1)))
# This is `1e-3 * sum(layer.dense.kernel ** 2)`,
# created by the `kernel_regularizer` above.
print(layer.losses)
Result
[Array(0.00217911, dtype=float32)]
These losses are meant to be taken into account when writing custom training loops.
They also work seamlessly with fit()
(they get automatically summed and added to the main loss, if any):
inputs = keras.Input(shape=(3,))
outputs = ActivityRegularizationLayer()(inputs)
model = keras.Model(inputs, outputs)
# If there is a loss passed in `compile`, the regularization
# losses get added to it
model.compile(optimizer="adam", loss="mse")
model.fit(np.random.random((2, 3)), np.random.random((2, 3)))
# It's also possible not to pass any loss in `compile`,
# since the model already has a loss to minimize, via the `add_loss`
# call during the forward pass!
model.compile(optimizer="adam")
model.fit(np.random.random((2, 3)), np.random.random((2, 3)))
Result
1/1 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0s 60ms/step - loss: 0.2650
1/1 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0s 15ms/step - loss: 0.0050
<keras.src.callbacks.history.History at 0x146f71960>
You can optionally enable serialization on your layers
If you need your custom layers to be serializable as part of a Functional model, you can optionally implement a get_config()
method:
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, units=32):
super().__init__()
self.units = units
def build(self, input_shape):
self.w = self.add_weight(
shape=(input_shape[-1], self.units),
initializer="random_normal",
trainable=True,
)
self.b = self.add_weight(
shape=(self.units,), initializer="random_normal", trainable=True
)
def call(self, inputs):
return ops.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
def get_config(self):
return {"units": self.units}
# Now you can recreate the layer from its config:
layer = Linear(64)
config = layer.get_config()
print(config)
new_layer = Linear.from_config(config)
Result
{'units': 64}
Note that the __init__()
method of the base Layer
class takes some keyword arguments, in particular a name
and a dtype
. It’s good practice to pass these arguments to the parent class in __init__()
and to include them in the layer config:
class Linear(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, units=32, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)
self.units = units
def build(self, input_shape):
self.w = self.add_weight(
shape=(input_shape[-1], self.units),
initializer="random_normal",
trainable=True,
)
self.b = self.add_weight(
shape=(self.units,), initializer="random_normal", trainable=True
)
def call(self, inputs):
return ops.matmul(inputs, self.w) + self.b
def get_config(self):
config = super().get_config()
config.update({"units": self.units})
return config
layer = Linear(64)
config = layer.get_config()
print(config)
new_layer = Linear.from_config(config)
Result
{'name': 'linear_7', 'trainable': True, 'dtype': 'float32', 'units': 64}
If you need more flexibility when deserializing the layer from its config, you can also override the from_config()
class method. This is the base implementation of from_config()
:
def from_config(cls, config):
return cls(**config)
To learn more about serialization and saving, see the complete guide to saving and serializing models.
Privileged training
argument in the call()
method
Some layers, in particular the BatchNormalization
layer and the Dropout
layer, have different behaviors during training and inference. For such layers, it is standard practice to expose a training
(boolean) argument in the call()
method.
By exposing this argument in call()
, you enable the built-in training and evaluation loops (e.g. fit()
) to correctly use the layer in training and inference.
class CustomDropout(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, rate, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)
self.rate = rate
self.seed_generator = keras.random.SeedGenerator(1337)
def call(self, inputs, training=None):
if training:
return keras.random.dropout(
inputs, rate=self.rate, seed=self.seed_generator
)
return inputs
Privileged mask
argument in the call()
method
The other privileged argument supported by call()
is the mask
argument.
You will find it in all Keras RNN layers. A mask is a boolean tensor (one boolean value per timestep in the input) used to skip certain input timesteps when processing timeseries data.
Keras will automatically pass the correct mask
argument to __call__()
for layers that support it, when a mask is generated by a prior layer. Mask-generating layers are the Embedding
layer configured with mask_zero=True
, and the Masking
layer.
The Model
class
In general, you will use the Layer
class to define inner computation blocks, and will use the Model
class to define the outer model – the object you will train.
For instance, in a ResNet50 model, you would have several ResNet blocks subclassing Layer
, and a single Model
encompassing the entire ResNet50 network.
The Model
class has the same API as Layer
, with the following differences:
- It exposes built-in training, evaluation, and prediction loops (
model.fit()
,model.evaluate()
,model.predict()
). - It exposes the list of its inner layers, via the
model.layers
property. - It exposes saving and serialization APIs (
save()
,save_weights()
…)
Effectively, the Layer
class corresponds to what we refer to in the literature as a “layer” (as in “convolution layer” or “recurrent layer”) or as a “block” (as in “ResNet block” or “Inception block”).
Meanwhile, the Model
class corresponds to what is referred to in the literature as a “model” (as in “deep learning model”) or as a “network” (as in “deep neural network”).
So if you’re wondering, “should I use the Layer
class or the Model
class?”, ask yourself: will I need to call fit()
on it? Will I need to call save()
on it? If so, go with Model
. If not (either because your class is just a block in a bigger system, or because you are writing training & saving code yourself), use Layer
.
For instance, we could take our mini-resnet example above, and use it to build a Model
that we could train with fit()
, and that we could save with save_weights()
:
class ResNet(keras.Model):
def __init__(self, num_classes=1000):
super().__init__()
self.block_1 = ResNetBlock()
self.block_2 = ResNetBlock()
self.global_pool = layers.GlobalAveragePooling2D()
self.classifier = Dense(num_classes)
def call(self, inputs):
x = self.block_1(inputs)
x = self.block_2(x)
x = self.global_pool(x)
return self.classifier(x)
resnet = ResNet()
dataset = ...
resnet.fit(dataset, epochs=10)
resnet.save(filepath.keras)
Putting it all together: an end-to-end example
Here’s what you’ve learned so far:
- A
Layer
encapsulate a state (created in__init__()
orbuild()
) and some computation (defined incall()
). - Layers can be recursively nested to create new, bigger computation blocks.
- Layers are backend-agnostic as long as they only use Keras APIs. You can use backend-native APIs (such as
jax.numpy
,torch.nn
ortf.nn
), but then your layer will only be usable with that specific backend. - Layers can create and track losses (typically regularization losses) via
add_loss()
. - The outer container, the thing you want to train, is a
Model
. AModel
is just like aLayer
, but with added training and serialization utilities.
Let’s put all of these things together into an end-to-end example: we’re going to implement a Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) in a backend-agnostic fashion – so that it runs the same with TensorFlow, JAX, and PyTorch. We’ll train it on MNIST digits.
Our VAE will be a subclass of Model
, built as a nested composition of layers that subclass Layer
. It will feature a regularization loss (KL divergence).
class Sampling(layers.Layer):
"""Uses (z_mean, z_log_var) to sample z, the vector encoding a digit."""
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)
self.seed_generator = keras.random.SeedGenerator(1337)
def call(self, inputs):
z_mean, z_log_var = inputs
batch = ops.shape(z_mean)[0]
dim = ops.shape(z_mean)[1]
epsilon = keras.random.normal(shape=(batch, dim), seed=self.seed_generator)
return z_mean + ops.exp(0.5 * z_log_var) * epsilon
class Encoder(layers.Layer):
"""Maps MNIST digits to a triplet (z_mean, z_log_var, z)."""
def __init__(self, latent_dim=32, intermediate_dim=64, name="encoder", **kwargs):
super().__init__(name=name, **kwargs)
self.dense_proj = layers.Dense(intermediate_dim, activation="relu")
self.dense_mean = layers.Dense(latent_dim)
self.dense_log_var = layers.Dense(latent_dim)
self.sampling = Sampling()
def call(self, inputs):
x = self.dense_proj(inputs)
z_mean = self.dense_mean(x)
z_log_var = self.dense_log_var(x)
z = self.sampling((z_mean, z_log_var))
return z_mean, z_log_var, z
class Decoder(layers.Layer):
"""Converts z, the encoded digit vector, back into a readable digit."""
def __init__(self, original_dim, intermediate_dim=64, name="decoder", **kwargs):
super().__init__(name=name, **kwargs)
self.dense_proj = layers.Dense(intermediate_dim, activation="relu")
self.dense_output = layers.Dense(original_dim, activation="sigmoid")
def call(self, inputs):
x = self.dense_proj(inputs)
return self.dense_output(x)
class VariationalAutoEncoder(keras.Model):
"""Combines the encoder and decoder into an end-to-end model for training."""
def __init__(
self,
original_dim,
intermediate_dim=64,
latent_dim=32,
name="autoencoder",
**kwargs
):
super().__init__(name=name, **kwargs)
self.original_dim = original_dim
self.encoder = Encoder(latent_dim=latent_dim, intermediate_dim=intermediate_dim)
self.decoder = Decoder(original_dim, intermediate_dim=intermediate_dim)
def call(self, inputs):
z_mean, z_log_var, z = self.encoder(inputs)
reconstructed = self.decoder(z)
# Add KL divergence regularization loss.
kl_loss = -0.5 * ops.mean(
z_log_var - ops.square(z_mean) - ops.exp(z_log_var) + 1
)
self.add_loss(kl_loss)
return reconstructed
Let’s train it on MNIST using the fit()
API:
(x_train, _), _ = keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = x_train.reshape(60000, 784).astype("float32") / 255
original_dim = 784
vae = VariationalAutoEncoder(784, 64, 32)
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-3)
vae.compile(optimizer, loss=keras.losses.MeanSquaredError())
vae.fit(x_train, x_train, epochs=2, batch_size=64)
Result
Epoch 1/2
938/938 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0942
Epoch 2/2
938/938 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1s 859us/step - loss: 0.0677
<keras.src.callbacks.history.History at 0x146fe62f0>